{"id":31,"date":"2009-01-25T20:42:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-26T00:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/?p=31"},"modified":"2009-01-25T20:42:00","modified_gmt":"2009-01-26T00:42:00","slug":"truth-at-a-time-and-truth-simpliciter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/2009\/01\/truth-at-a-time-and-truth-simpliciter\/","title":{"rendered":"Truth at a Time and Truth Simpliciter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As a follow-up to my <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alanrhoda.net\/blog\/2009\/01\/on-truth-at-t-and-being-at-t.html#links\">previous post<\/a>, I&#8217;d like to say a bit about how truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">at a time<\/span> and truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">at a world<\/span> relate to truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike &#8216;truth at a world&#8217; and &#8216;truth at a time&#8217;, truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span> is not evaluated from the perspective of any given time or world, but absolutely. In other words, it is evaluated from the proverbial &#8220;God&#8217;s eye&#8221; or absolute perspective, that is, in relation to what exists <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. Consequently, what is true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span> depends on the correct metaphysics.<\/p>\n<p>Actualism is the thesis that the only possible world that exists <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span> is the actual world, whereas possibilism is the thesis that all possible worlds exist <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. Presentism is the thesis that only what exists <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">now<\/span> exists <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>, whereas eternalism is the thesis that all past, present, and future world states exist <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. If actualism and presentism are correct, then what exists <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span> is coextensive with what exists <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">now<\/span>. Moreover, truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span> coincides with what is true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">now<\/span>. Hence, &#8220;Obama is now President&#8221; is true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, if actualism and eternalism are correct, then all instantaneous world states (however foliated into past, present, and future) exist <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. As a result, truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span> and truth <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">at a time<\/span> can come apart. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Omnitemporal<\/span> truths, which are true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">at all times<\/span>, hold distributively across the entire time series and are true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. So are <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">transtemporal <\/span>truths, which hold collectively of the entire time series. These can, but arguably need not, be true at all times in the series. For example, &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><\/span>At some time or other, Obama is President&#8221; is true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. It is also true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">now<\/span>. But it may not have been true at all earlier times because the fact that makes it true may not be accessible from all earlier times. One way in which this could happen (defended by Peirce, Prior, Hartshorne, and Ryle) is through reference failure. Arguably, before Obama was conceived, there was no such individual for propositions to refer to. Finally, there may be (though this is controversial) <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">atemporal <\/span>truths, truths about matters that stand in no relation to time whatsoever. These truths, if they exist, are true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>, but fail to be true at <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">any<\/span> time. (Some people think mathematical truths fall into this category. I doubt this. I say that &#8216;2+2=4&#8217; is omnitemporally true, not atemporally true. It sounds rather odd to say that it isn&#8217;t true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">now<\/span>.)<\/p>\n<p>Finally, if possibilism and eternalism are correct, then all worlds and all instantaneous world states in all worlds exist <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. As before, truths that hold distibutively over all world-time pairs (i.e., at all times in all worlds) will be true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. Similarly, anything that is true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><\/span>at all worlds (i.e., necessary truths) will be true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. Further, truths that hold collectively of the entire world\/history ensemble (e.g., &#8220;At some time in some world Obama is President&#8221;) will be true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">simpliciter<\/span>. This latter truth is true <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">now<\/span> in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">alpha<\/span> (the actual world), but it need not be true true at all times in all worlds for it may not be accessible from all times in all worlds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a follow-up to my previous post, I&#8217;d like to say a bit about how truth at a time and truth at a world relate to truth simpliciter. Unlike &#8216;truth at a world&#8217; and &#8216;truth at a time&#8217;, truth simpliciter is not evaluated from the perspective of any given time or world, but absolutely. In\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/2009\/01\/truth-at-a-time-and-truth-simpliciter\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}