{"id":40,"date":"2008-09-10T19:59:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-10T23:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/?p=40"},"modified":"2008-09-10T19:59:00","modified_gmt":"2008-09-10T23:59:00","slug":"versions-of-incompatibilism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/2008\/09\/versions-of-incompatibilism\/","title":{"rendered":"Versions of Incompatibilism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In philosophical discussions, and especially in philosophy of religion, the term &#8220;incompatibilism&#8221; comes up in wide variety of contexts. I&#8217;ve discerned five different types of incompatibilism.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Moral incompatibilism:<\/span> The thesis that human moral responsibility is incompatible with thoroughgoing causal determinism.<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ontic incompatibilism:<\/span> The thesis that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">foreexistence<\/span> is incompatible with future contingency. More precisely, the thesis that if a unique and complete sequence of future world states were to (tenselessly) exist, then the future would be causally determined.<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Alethic incompatibilism:<\/span> The thesis that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">foretruth<\/span> is incompatible with future contingency. More precisely, the thesis that if the future could be fully and accurately described in terms of what either &#8216;will&#8217; or &#8216;will not&#8217; happen, then the future would be causally determined.<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Epistemic incompatibilism<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">:<\/span><\/span> The thesis that infallible <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">foreknowledge<\/span> is incompatible with future contingency. More precisely, the thesis that if a perfect knower (like God) could exhaustively and infallibly know the future in terms of what either &#8216;will&#8217; or &#8216;will not&#8217; happen, then the future would be causally determined.<\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Providential incompatibilism:<\/span> The thesis that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">foreordination<\/span> is incompatible with future contingency. More precisely, the thesis that if a perfectly provident being (like God) were to efficaciously foreordain <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">all <\/span>of the details of the future, then the future would be causally determined.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There are, of course, complex debates surrounding each of these. I happen to be an incompatibilist in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">all five <\/span>senses, but regardless of how these debates turn out, it is important to keep these issues distinct. Many thinkers are incompatibilists in some of these senses but compatibilists in others.<\/p>\n<p>Incidentally, if moral incompatibilism (1) is true, then, given how I&#8217;ve defined (2)-(5), it follows that moral responsibility is incompatible with foreexistence, foretruth, foreknowledge, and foreordination.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In philosophical discussions, and especially in philosophy of religion, the term &#8220;incompatibilism&#8221; comes up in wide variety of contexts. I&#8217;ve discerned five different types of incompatibilism. Moral incompatibilism: The thesis that human moral responsibility is incompatible with thoroughgoing causal determinism. Ontic incompatibilism: The thesis that foreexistence is incompatible with future contingency. More precisely, the thesis\u2026 <span class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/2008\/09\/versions-of-incompatibilism\/\">Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=40"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=40"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=40"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/alanrhoda.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=40"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}