Open theism has been much-discussed in philosophy of religion and theology circles since the 1995 publication of Pinnock, et al.’s The Openness of God. But in many ways I find that the view is still poorly understood. Critics frequently fail to appreciate that there are several importantly different versions of open theism. First, we need… Read More: Four Versions of Open Theism »
I’ve been invited to become a contributor to the Prosblogion blog, a very fine place for discussions in the philosophy of religion. So from time-to-time I’ll be posting over there, in which cases I’ll either dual-post over here or provide a link for those who might be interested.
According to classical theism (as exemplified by Aquinas), God is “Pure Act”. What does that mean, you ask? Good question. The idea goes back to Aristotle, but we’ll pick it up with Aquinas. Very early on in the Summa Theologiae Aquinas says the following: For motion [motus, i.e., change] is nothing else than the reduction… Read More: Is God “Pure Act”? »
There’s an interesting discussion on the Christian doctrine of the Trinity going on at Prosblogion. I figure this is as good a time as any to dust off some speculations of my own on the subject. The doctrine of the Trinity, a cornerstone of Christian orthodoxy, may be summed up in the following two propositions:… Read More: Perfect Love and the Trinity »
I just woke up from a dream in which I was being chased by a very persistent Thomist who wanted to sift my soul through some sort of metaphysical meat-grinder. Not wanting to find out what that would do to me, I escaped to Paradise, where I learned that Father Abraham now relaxes in a… Read More: Raving Thomists »
In a previous post, I commented that truth-functional interpretations of conditionals are bothered by what are known as the “paradoxes of material implication”. The problem arises because it is easy to form conditionals that, on the truth-functional interpretation, come out as true when, intuitively, they aren’t true. What I want to point out now is… Read More: The Paradoxes of Material Disjunction »
A ‘disjunction’ is an either-or proposition. It has the form “Either A or B or …”, where the terms A, B, etc. are called ‘disjuncts’. The simplest type of disjunction has only two disjuncts: Either A or B. Taking the “or” here in the usual inclusive sense, what this says is simply “Here are the… Read More: Are Disjunctions Truth-Functional? »
I was reminded today of some insightful thoughts from the Maverick Philosopher: Liberty and security stand in a dialectical relation to each other in that (i) each requires the other to be what it is, and yet (ii) each is opposed to the other. … Ad (i). Liberty worth having is liberty capable of being… Read More: The Dialectic of Liberty and Security »
I just finished a paper defending what philosopher Arthur Prior called the “Peircean” system of tense logic over against the rival “Ockhamist” system. You can download the paper here (100kB, PDF). I’ll be reading this paper at the group meeting of the Philosophy of Time Society at the Pacific APA conference in March. For some… Read More: In Defense of Prior’s ‘Peircean’ Tense Logic »
In Section 4 of his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume makes a famous distinction between “matters of fact” and “relations of ideas” All the objects of human reason or enquiry fall naturally into two kinds, namely relations of ideas and matters of fact. The first kind include geometry, algebra, and arithmetic, and indeed every… Read More: What’s Wrong with Hume’s Fork »