Here is a link to a silly bot that thinks it’s God. My conversation: Me: HelloGod: Hello friend. What is your name?Me: Don’t you know?God: Sure I know. But I cannot tell you right now.Me: Why not?God: Because Myself programmed me for it.Me: Hmmm.God: A lot of people spell HMMM with three mmm’s.Me: Why?God: I… Read More: Chatting With God »
My occasional metaphysical sparring partner, Ian Spencer, poses the following objection to presentism – the view that only what exists now exists simpliciter: Here’s a problem for most forms of presentism – on most versions, there’s no good answer to the question of why this time is the present one. That is, why does the… Read More: Why Is This Time the Present? »
First, the position I want to argue against is essential divine timelessness – the idea that, of necessity, God cannot change in any respect or stand in any temporal relations. Second, here is my argument: God is able to exercise providence. God’s exercising providence entails the making of choices on God’s part. A choice is… Read More: A Short Argument against Divine Timelessness »
Just a short post, but I’d like to comment on one particular maxim advanced by philosopher Charles S. Peirce, a maxim which I strongly endorse: Do not block the road of inquiry! What Peirce means by this is that we ought never to draw a line in the sand and say that theorizing cannot, must… Read More: Do Not Block the Road of Inquiry »
Here’s a nice post by Bill Vallicella arguing, correctly in my opinion, that it can sometimes be morally obligatory for a government to wage war even if doing so brings about the deaths of noncombatants. The key point is that we must not confuse the norms of private morality (the Golden Rule, turning the other… Read More: Private vs. Public Morality and “Collateral Damage” in War »
A colleague called my attention to this Foxtrot comic (©Bill Amend). It originally appeared October 11, 2006. (HT: Rick Beckman by way of James Woodbridge)
My wife sent me a link to this hilarious story from a parody news website: “Calvinist Church Dumps Free Will Offerings”
In the comments section of a recent post at one of Victor Reppert’s blogs I’ve been engaged in a very interesting and stimulating conversation with a fellow who calls himself ‘exapologist’ about the status of abstract objects (propositions, numbers, sets, etc.). I’m arguing for theistic conceptualism (abstract objects exist necessarily as ideas in the mind… Read More: Theism, Platonism, and Abstract Objects »
By “suffering” I mean pain, whether physical or emotional.By “evil” I mean moral evil, i.e., sin, wickedness. It is important to keep these distinct. For one thing, not all suffering is evil – it was a good thing that my parents disciplined me, even though it hurt sometimes. In addition, while evil acts may cause… Read More: The Problem of Evil and the Problem of Suffering »
In connection with the topic of my preceding post, I just noticed a comment that David Tye had left on a previous post of mine about half-a-year ago. His comment is very insightful: Flying spaghetti monsters and teapots are things immanent with respect to the universe. God – if He exists – is utterly transcendent.… Read More: Why Teapots and Spaghetti Monsters Miss the Point »